The development

The Development

What Starwood wants to build on Princeville’s protected open space, what lies beneath it, and what the courts have said.

In their own words: all 27 holes

Asked at trial whether Starwood wanted soil testing across all 27 holes “because you were thinking of either the potential development or sale of all 27 holes”:

“That’s correct.”
Jason Cruce, Starwood, under oath, June 25, 2025
“The Mull/White litigation strategy foolishly jeopardizes risk of development on all 27 holes.”
James Raved, Starwood’s corporate lawyer, Nextdoor, July 2, 2026

Sources: trial testimony of Jason Cruce (June 25, 2025); James Raved on Nextdoor (July 2, 2026, screenshot on file). What “all 27 holes” means ↓

01

The Anthrax

Beneath the Woods Course lies a burial ground from the 1917 anthrax outbreak. After a full trial in 2025, the court found that “there are anthrax burial sites on the Woods Course.”

  1. 1917–1919
    The outbreakAn anthrax outbreak on the Princeville Ranch, “which includes the area that is now the Woods Course,” began in April 1917 and lasted until March 1919. Between 300 and 500 head of cattle died, according to multiple witnesses, along with an unknown number of horses and mules. Most carcasses were buried and covered with quicklime.
    “Impossible to burn bodies, dying too quickly. Am burying and liming.”Telegram from Hanalei signed “Glaisyer,” April 13, 1917
  2. 1975
    Buyers were told, in writingThe Public Offering Statement for Emmalani Subdivision said: “Within Emmalani Subdivision, there exist cattle burial sites which are thought to date back to the 1917 bovine anthrax epidemic. The sites were marked with planting of silver oak trees.”
  3. Built around the graves
    The golf course avoided themWhen Robert Trent Jones Jr. designed the Woods Course, the developer’s chief engineer, Curly Carswell, cautioned him against digging where the silver oaks grow “to avoid unearthing the anthrax-infested graves.” Jones testified that he designed the course to avoid any digging near those trees.
  4. 1979
    The State said: leave them undisturbedCommenting on a golf course permit, the Department of Health wrote that burial sites of cattle afflicted by anthrax, marked by silver oak trees, “shall be left undisturbed during grading or land clearing operations.”
  5. 2020
    Starwood was warnedAn August 2020 email to Starwood’s Jason Cruce, relaying a meeting with Robert Trent Jones Jr., said the silver oaks “remain and should not be touched,” and warned: “Anthrax is still potentially dangerous if dug up; stay away from the area.” Starwood’s own December 2020 cultural study, prepared for its glamping permit, recorded the same history.
  6. 2024–2025
    What Starwood’s testing foundStarwood’s consultants took 188 soil samples from the Woods Course in fall 2024. The court found that 14 were “suspect,” meaning they “had positive results for at least some of the B. anthracis markers”; that ground-penetrating radar found 38 sites “consistent with grave sites”; and that Starwood’s own experts “could not say anthrax is not in the soil.” It found Starwood’s testing witnesses “not credible.”

Why it matters

Anthrax spores can survive in soil “for decades, even hundreds of years,” and lime, like the quicklime used in 1917, helps protect them. Experts on both sides agreed on that. The plaintiffs’ three anthrax experts agreed that the best way to ensure safety is to leave the ground undisturbed, and Starwood’s own medical expert agreed that if anthrax is there, it is best left undisturbed.

Even the State Department of Health, which has said Starwood may do maintenance and emergency repairs under a safety plan, wrote in May 2026: “We agree it is best to assume there might be some level of contamination.”

Sources: Mull & White v. SOF-XI Kauai PV Golf, Fifth Circuit Court, 5CCV-21-0000063, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (July 14, 2025) ¶¶84–85, 89–91, 93, 100, 119, 128, 130, 132–133, 190; The Hawaiian Forester and Agriculturist (June 1917); Emmalani Subdivision Public Offering Statement, Reg. No. S-540 (1975, amended 1976), §8(d); Department of Health comments of June 25, 1979, quoted in the State Land Use Commission staff report on SP80-349 (Dec. 9, 1980); trial testimony of Jason Cruce (June 25, 2025); Ka Paʻakai O Ka ʻÄina Analysis prepared for SOF-XI Kauai PV Golf (Dec. 2020), p. 75; Department of Health email of May 14, 2026, filed with Starwood’s motion of July 6, 2026.

02

All 27 Holes

“The Mull/White litigation strategy foolishly jeopardizes risk of development on all 27 holes.”
James Raved, Starwood’s attorney, on Nextdoor, July 2026

Starwood’s lawyer says he never threatened to develop all 27 holes. But in his own words, all 27 are at risk. In the same post, he wrote that limiting development to the Woods nine, in exchange for an agreement, “would have preserved the Ocean-9 and the Lakes-9.” This is what “all 27 holes” means.

Map of Princeville showing the 27-hole Makai golf course: the Ocean nine and Lakes nine in green, the closed Woods nine in rust, the 1 Hotel Hanalei Bay on the bluff, Hideaways Beach, Puʻu Poʻa Beach and Hanalei Bay.
Ocean nineLakes nineWoods nine, where Starwood plans homesProposed homes and pavilion on the bluff Our own map, drawn from OpenStreetMap data. The lines between the nines are approximate. Open the map full size ↗
27
holes: the Ocean, Lakes and Woods nines
343
acres set aside for the course in the 1969 Master Plan
1/3
of Princeville’s first phase, by that plan
75%
of all votes needed to end the protection

What the court, and Starwood itself, say

The court, July 2025

“The Dedication is a declaration restricting the 27-hole golf course in Princeville to ‘golf course and ancillary recreational uses.’” It “will automatically renew for successive five-year periods beginning at 12:00 a.m. on March 1, 2026, unless 75% of the Princeville at Hanalei landowners vote to terminate the Dedication.” “To date, no such vote has occurred.”

Starwood, in court, August 2025

“In a nutshell, the Dedication applies to all the parcels of land that presently make up the 27-hole Princeville Makai Golf Club, including the nine-hole Woods Course. The Dedication contains its own time-limited restrictions that lapse next year.”

In other words, Starwood argues on appeal that the protection for all 27 holes ran out in 2026.

Starwood’s own handout, May 2021

“In the event that Starwood is not successful in its pursuit of glamping or other profitable use prior to the expiration of the dedication, the land becomes available for development according Kauai County Zoning.”

Starwood, in court, September 2021

“As the owner of the Makai Course, SOF-XI has the right to use and develop the Makai Course in a manner that is consistent with the applicable zoning laws and otherwise permitted by applicable law.”

Under oath, June 2025

Asked whether he had wanted soil testing across all 27 holes “because you were thinking of either the potential development or sale of all 27 holes,” Starwood’s Jason Cruce answered: “That’s correct.”

What we would lose

Every fairway on this map is open space that neighbors live beside, look out on and walk along. If Starwood wins its appeal, all of it, not just the Woods, could be opened to development: the views, the walking paths, the wildlife habitat and the fire breaks that run through the heart of Princeville.

Sources: James Raved on Nextdoor (July 2026); Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (July 14, 2025) ¶¶26, 67, 182; Starwood’s Motion to Amend the Findings or for a New Trial (Aug. 18, 2025), p. 1; Starwood Capital Group and East West Partners, “Glamping in Princeville: Introduction, Plans and Frequently Asked Questions” (May 18, 2021), p. 10; SOF-XI’s Third-Party Complaint (Sept. 7, 2021) ¶29; trial testimony of Jason Cruce (June 25, 2025); Belt, Collins & Associates, Land Development Plans: Planning for Princeville at Hanalei (April 1969), Table 2; CC&Rs Article VIII, Section 2. Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.

03

Puʻu Poʻa

On the bluff beside the 1 Hotel, next to Puʻu Poʻa and above Hanalei Bay, Starwood’s hotel wants to build luxury homes and an event pavilion. In May 2026, four community groups won the right to fight it before the Kauaʻi Planning Commission.

What is proposed

“Two-story six-plex housing units, ranging from 3,000 to 4,500 square feet, a new 4,500-square-foot event pavilion with two ballrooms and ancillary structures, expanded parking and infrastructure,” and redevelopment of the historic Fort Alexander area.

The hotel’s own April 2026 invitation to Association members described “a thoughtfully designed gathering space, along with a limited 1 Homes residential component.” Starwood’s attorney has called it development “adjacent to the hotel on the Pu’uPoa blufftop.”

Why it matters

It would “intensify commercial construction along an actively eroding coastal bluff overlooking Hanalei Bay, with some structures proposed as close as five feet from the cliff edge.”

Opponents are concerned that it would “further degrade coastal resources, worsen the ongoing harms to native seabirds from the resort, impair public scenic view planes, and interfere with Native Hawaiian cultural practices.” Earthjustice notes “more than 25% of all documented seabird take on Kauaʻi occurring at this single resort—far exceeding its authorized take quota.”

What Starwood’s motion asks for

In its April 9, 2026 Motion to Amend, the 1 Hotel’s owner asks the Kauaʻi Planning Commission to allow:

  • Six homes of 3,000 to 4,500 square feet each, in a two-story six-plex, to be sold, with the option to rent them out with the hotel’s rooms.
  • A 4,500-square-foot event pavilion with two ballrooms, for “events and celebrations.”
  • A new parking lot with 126 stalls in place of today’s 219, plus garages for the homes. Extra cars would be valet-parked on the Makai Golf Course.
  • Tearing down the Fort Alexander pavilion to build a new “storyboards memorial” and a covered walkway, inside the Fort’s preservation buffer.
  • Construction from 2026 to 2028.

The motion itself says the project land is under the PHCA’s covenants. And when the Planning Commission approved the Fort’s preservation plan in 1991, it ruled that “The Fort grounds shall be used only for open space.”

In Starwood’s own drawings

These renderings are from the hotel’s April 9, 2026 Motion to Amend, filed with the Kauaʻi Planning Commission and obtained through a public-records request. Tap a picture to see it larger.

Rendering of six homes, an event pavilion and a parking lot on the bluff beside the 1 Hotel, above Hanalei Bay
The whole project on the bluff: six homes, the event pavilion and a new parking lot with garages, beside the 1 Hotel above Hanalei Bay.
Rendering of the homes along the top of the bluff
Six homes of 3,000 to 4,500 square feet each, along the top of the bluff. The motion says they would be sold, with the option to rent them out with the hotel’s rooms.
Rendering of the row of homes on the bluff top
The row of homes along the bluff top.
Rendering of the event pavilion from above
The 4,500-square-foot event pavilion, with two ballrooms, northeast of Fort Alexander. The motion says it will be used “for events and celebrations.”
Rendering of the pavilion interior set for a banquet, with a drum kit on a dance floor
Inside the pavilion, set for a banquet, with a drum kit and keyboard on a dance floor. The motion’s section on noise addresses only construction.
Rendering of a covered walkway curving around the open bluff top
A new covered walkway would curve around the open bluff top at Fort Alexander. The motion says the walkway and a new Fort memorial are the parts of the project inside the Fort’s preservation buffer.

May 26, 2026: the community gets a seat at the table

The Kauaʻi Planning Commission granted intervention to four community groups: Mālama Kuaʻāina, the Hanalei-Wainiha-Hāʻena Community Association, Hui Hoʻomalu i Ka ʻĀina and the Conservation Council for Hawaiʻi. They are represented by Earthjustice attorney Elena Bryant, and can now submit evidence and present expert testimony.

“Our coastlines are not sacrifice zones for luxury development.”Caren Diamond, Executive Director, Mālama Kuaʻāina

Meet the four groups and their lawyers →

Sources: Earthjustice, “Community Groups Granted Intervention in Review of Luxury Coastal Development on Kauaʻi’s Historic Hanalei Bay” (May 27, 2026); Kauai Now, “Intervention granted in review of luxury development at Hanalei Bay” (May 28, 2026); 1 Hotel Hanalei Bay community invitation (April 2026); James Raved on Nextdoor (July 2026); Applicant’s Motion to Amend Master Permit and Renovation Permit (1 Homes Project), SOF-XI Kauai PV Hotel, L.P., Kauaʻi Planning Commission (April 9, 2026), §§A–D, 2.1b, 2.2g, 3.1, 3.2 and 6.3, Exhibit D-10 (Planning Commission, Jan. 14, 1991) and Exhibit E-2 (renderings by Lake|Flato, June 6, 2025), obtained through a public-records request.

04

The Mull & White Case

Two Princeville homeowners, Lorraine Mull and Frances White, took Starwood to court in 2021, and won. Every owner in Princeville owes them thanks. Their group, Save Open Space Hui, shares the court filings and the full story at SOSHui.org ↗.

  1. June 2021
    The lawsuitMull and White sue SOF-XI Kauai PV Golf, Starwood’s golf company, to stop its glamping project on the Woods Course. A month later, the PHCA’s president at the time, Sam George, files a declaration saying that if “an acceptable community benefits package can be negotiated,” then “it is possible the Board will support the Defendant’s plans.”
  2. Dec 2021
    No campgroundKauaʻi County bans developed campgrounds on the land. Starwood withdraws its glamping application the same day.
  3. 2022
    Starwood tries to end the caseThe court denies Starwood’s motion to dismiss: “There is an active controversy.” Starwood then asks the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court to order the case dismissed. The PHCA, represented by Doug Chin, asks to file a brief there, which Mull and White’s lawyers oppose as a brief “in support of” Starwood. In October 2022 the Supreme Court turns Starwood down.
  4. Aug 2023
    No glamping, no overnight staysThe court rules: “The Dedication does not permit glamping or other overnight accommodations on the Burdened Land.”
  5. Oct 2023
    The case growsMull and White amend their complaint. They add that the CC&Rs renew the Dedication automatically every five years (Article VIII, Section 2), and they add claims over the anthrax burial grounds under the Woods and Starwood’s housing plans.
  6. July 2025
    The verdictAfter a trial in June, the court finds that the Dedication protects “the 27-hole golf course,” that it renews automatically every five years unless 75% of landowners vote to end it, and that “there are anthrax burial sites on the Woods Course.”
  7. Aug 2025
    The judgmentStarwood is barred from “any sort of use of the burdened land that is not a golf course and ancillary recreational uses, including a residential housing development or any sort of overnight accommodations,” and from its “contemplated housing development, or any other ground-disturbing activity, without appropriate testing, oversight, and court approval.”
  8. 2025–2026
    Starwood appealsStarwood appeals to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, where the appeal is pending. In 2026 it also asked the trial court to approve ground-disturbing work under a “safety plan.” On May 19, 2026, Judge Stephanie Char declined, while making clear that mowing, basic landscaping and maintenance are allowed. Starwood has asked her to reconsider.

What the win means today

  • All 27 holes stay golf course and open space.
  • That protection covers all seven parcels in the Dedication. Besides the golf holes, SOS Hui notes, they include the golf parking lot and the Makai Club, pro shop and tennis courts.
  • No glamping, no housing and no overnight accommodations on the course.
  • No digging without testing, oversight and court approval.
  • The protection renews every five years unless owners holding 75% of the votes decide to end it.
  • Starwood has appealed, so the fight is not over.

The whole story, from 1971 to today: SOS Hui’s history →  ·  Visit SOSHui.org ↗

Sources: Mull & White v. SOF-XI Kauai PV Golf, Fifth Circuit Court, 5CCV-21-0000063: Complaint (June 24, 2021); Declaration of Sam George (July 15, 2021); Order Denying Motion to Dismiss (May 2, 2022); Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on summary judgment (Aug. 2, 2023) ¶¶22–23, 30; First Amended Complaint (Oct. 13, 2023); Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (July 14, 2025); Judgment (Aug. 6, 2025) ¶3; hearing of May 19, 2026, and Starwood’s motion of July 6, 2026. Hawaiʻi Supreme Court, SCPW-22-0000526, orders of Oct. 14, 2022. Intermediate Court of Appeals, CAAP-25-0000609. Dedication of Golf Course Property (May 12, 1972), Schedule A.

05

Proposed Developments

Starwood has spent the years since it bought the golf course trying one development idea after another on Princeville’s open space.

2020–2021

A glamping resort

“50 luxury glamping tents” over holes 1–3 of the Woods Course. Starwood withdrew the plan in December 2021, the day the County banned campgrounds on the land.

May 2021

A package deal

In exchange for the PHCA’s support, Starwood proposed the 50 campsites; a parking structure of up to 400 stalls on the golf course parking area along Ka Haku Road; and “1 Homes Hanalei,” up to 24 apartment-hotel units or 6 single-family homes on the hotel’s parking lot. The PHCA Board rejected the offer on June 17, 2021.

2024–2025

Luxury homes on the Woods

Plans for “numerous residential lots ranging from a few large ‘gentleman estates’ to smaller villa lots,” covering Woods holes 1–3, 4, 5, 8 and 9. Starwood intended to be “shovel-ready” by March 1, 2026, with utilities trenched “up to 20 feet deep,” on the anthrax burial ground. The court’s judgment stopped it.

2026

Homes and a pavilion on the bluff

Two-story luxury homes, an event pavilion with two ballrooms, and more parking on the eroding bluff beside the hotel. See Puʻu Poʻa →

Sources: Starwood Capital Group and East West Partners, “Glamping in Princeville: Introduction, Plans and Frequently Asked Questions” (May 18, 2021); Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on summary judgment (Aug. 2, 2023) ¶¶22–23; SOF-XI Kauai PV Holdings letter to the PHCA (May 2021); PHCA Board resolution (Nov. 19, 2021); Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (July 14, 2025) ¶¶74, 76–77; Judgment (Aug. 6, 2025); Earthjustice (May 27, 2026); Starwood’s Motion to Amend the Findings (Aug. 18, 2025).

Sources are listed with each topic.